Transparency in internet regulation and governance: arguments and counter-arguments with some methodological reflections

Autores

  • Gianluca Andresani Durham Law School
  • Natalina Stamile Universidade de Bergamo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9732/rbep.v117i0.624

Resumo

The debate on the argumentative turn in Public Policy and Administration (PPA), as reflective of the influence of political-legal theory on the discipline, is reviewed with a thorough and indepth engagement with the Argumentation Theory (AT) literature. The focus in this article is in fact of a methodological nature, since we argue that critical scholars - who have contributed to the general and specialized (i.e. political
discourse analysis and critical contextualism) literature of AT as well as politico-legal theory - pave way to a novel methodology which will be exemplifed through the analysis of the transparency concept.



 

Biografia do Autor

Gianluca Andresani, Durham Law School

 

Natalina Stamile, Universidade de Bergamo

 

 

 

 

 

Downloads

Publicado

2018-11-15

Como Citar

Andresani, G., & Stamile, N. (2018). Transparency in internet regulation and governance: arguments and counter-arguments with some methodological reflections. Revista Brasileira De Estudos Políticos, 117. https://doi.org/10.9732/rbep.v117i0.624

Edição

Seção

Artigos