O Jusnaturalismo Tomista do século XX nos Estados Unidos (II)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9732/rbep.v119i0.737Resumo
Este é o quarto e último da série de artigos publicados pelo autor na Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos, sobre o pensamento tomista. O Jusnaturalismo Tomista do século XX nos Estados Unidos oferece um vasto panorama da força e profundidade representada pelo jusnaturalismo estadunidense. Esta parte conclui a apresentação das diversas correntes e doutrinas relacionas ao tomismo, sua ligação com a lei natural, os autores mais influentes, suas obras, as divergências e atuais debates doutrinais existentes entre eles – e apresenta as principais revistas, congressos tomistas e medievalistas, o que permite compreender a importância e vitalidade do jusnaturalismo norte-americano.
Referências
ADLER, Mortimer. Aristotle for Everybody. New York: Tochstone, 1978.
_____. “A Sound Moral Philosophy”, en Reforming Education: The Opening of the American Mind, New York, Collier Books & Macmillan Publishing, 1990, pp. 254-62.
_____. Reforming Education: The Opening of the American Mind. NewYork: Collier Books and Macmillan, 1990.
ANSCOMBE, G. E. M., “Modern moral philosophy”, en Ethics, Religion, and Politics,
-42. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981, originalmente en Philosophy, 33/124 (Jan. 1958), pp. 1-19.
AYERS, Michael R. “Locke versus Aristotle on natural kinds”, en Journal of Philosophy, 78/5 (May 1981), pp. 247-72.
BARRET, William. Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy. New York: Anchor Books, 1956.
BIGGAR, Nigel (y Black, Rufus). The revival of Natural Law. London-New York: Routledge, 2000.
BOYLE, Joseph M. “Practical reasoning and moral judgment”, en Proceedings of the
American Catholic Philosophical Association 58 (1984), pp. 37-49.
BROCK, Stephen L. “The legal character of natural law according to St Thomas
Aquinas”, Tesis doctoral (Ph.D. dissertation), University of Toronto, 1988.
_____. “Natural inclination and the intelligibility of the good in thomistic
natural law”, en Vera Lex 6 (2005), pp. 57-78.
_____. “Natural Law, the Understanding of Principles, and Universal Good”, Nova et Vetera (English edition) 9 (2011), pp. 671-706.
BUTERA, Giuseppe, “The moral status of the first principle of practical reason in Thomas’s natural-law theory”, Thomist 71 (2007), pp. 609-31.
VVAA. Natural Law and Modern Society. New York: The World Publishing Company,
CARPINTERO, Francisco. La ley natural, una realidad por explicar. México D.F.: Universidad Autónoma de México, 2013.
CHAPPELL, Timothy, “Natural law revived: Natural law theory and contemporary moral philosophy”, en The Revival of Natural Law: Philosophical, Theological and Ethical Responses to the Finnis-Grisez School, ed. por Nigel Biggar y Rufus Black, Sydney, Ashgate, 2000, pp. 29-52.
CORWIN, Edward S. “The ‘higher law’ background of American Constitutional Law”, en Harvard Law Review 42 (3) (1929), pp. 365-409.
DAVIDSON, Donald. “How is weakness of will possible”, en Essays on Actions and
Events, 21-42. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1980.
DAVIES, Brian. The Thought of Thomas Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
DEWAN, Lawrence. “Jacques Maritain and the Philosophy of Cooperation”, en L’Altérité, vivre ensemble différents: approches pluridisciplinaires, coord. por Michel Gourges and Gilles-D Mailhiot, Montreal, Editions Bellarmin, 1986, pp. 109-17.
_____. “St. Thomas, our natural lights, and the moral order”. Roma: Angelicum 67 (1990), pp. 285-307.
_____. “St. Thomas, John Finnis, and the political good”, Thomist 64 (2000), pp. 337-74.
_____. “Natural law in the first act of freedom: Maritain revisited”, en Wisdom, Law, and Virtue, New York, Fordham University Press, 2008, pp. 231-41.
DI BLASI, Fulvio. God and the Natural Law: A Rereading of Thomas Aquinas. St.
Bend (Ind.): Augustine’s Press South, 2006.
DONAGAN, Alan, “The scholastic theory of moral law in the modern world”, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association (1966), pp. 29-40.
_____. Human Ends and human Actions: An Exploration in St. Thomas´s Treatment. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1985.
DWORKIN, Ronald. “Interview”, in Bryan Magee, Men of Ideas. New York: Viking
Adult, 1978, pp. 242-60.
_____. “Natural’ law revisited”, en University of Florida Law Review 34/2
(Winter, 1982), pp. 165-88.
_____. A matter of Principle, especialmente el ensayo “Libaralism”, de la parte tercera del libro, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard, 1985, pp. 181-204.
FINNIS, John. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 1998.
_____. Fundamentals of Ethics. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1983.
_____. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Clarendon Law Series), 1980.
GRISEZ, Germain. “The first principle of practical reason”, en American Journal of Jurisprudence 10 (1) (1965), pp. 168-201, traducido por Diego Poole en Persona y Derecho, 2005, en http://www.twotlj.org/EthicalTheory.html.
_____. Beyond the New Morality: The Responsibilities of Freedom, Notre Dame, Notre Dame University Press, 1974.
HAINE, Charles. The Revival of Natural Law Concepts (1930). Reedit. por William S
Hein & Co: Getzville (NY), 1979.
HITTINGER, Russell. A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. Notre Dame (Indiana): University of Notre Dame Press, 1987.
_____. “Introducción a Rommen, H.”, The Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy (1936 vers. original alemana), Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 1998.
_____. The First Grace: Rediscovering Natural Law in a Post-Christian Age. Wilmington (Delaware): Isi Books, 2003.
JENSEN, Steven. Knowing The Natural Law, Washington, The Catholic University
Press, 2015.
KNIGHT, Frank H. “Natural law: Last refuge of the bigot”, en Ethics 59 (2) (1949),
pp. 127-135.
LEVERING, Mathew. Biblical Natural Law: A Theocentric and Teleological Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
LISS KA, Anthony. Aquinas’s Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
LOCKE, John. “An Essay concerning the true original, extent and end of civil Government (1690)”, en Two Treatises on Government, London, R. Butler & others, 1821 (disponível em: www.bartleby.com/169/).
LONG, Steven A. “St. Thomas Aquinas through the analytic looking-glass”, en Thomist
(2001), pp. 259-300.
_____. “Natural law or autonomous practical reason: problems for the new natural law theory” en St. Thomas Aquinas and the Natural Law Tradition: Contemporary Perspectives, Washington D.C, The Catholic University of America Press, 2004, pp. 65-193.
MACINTYRE. Alasdair, After Virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Univerity Press, 1981.
MARTIN, Patrick H. “Natural Law: Voegelin and The End of [Legal] Philosophy”, en
Louisiana Law Review 62 (3) (2002). 223
MARTÍNEZ, Julio Luis, S.J. Consenso público y moral social: las relaciones entre catolicismo y liberalismo en la obra de John Courtney Murray. Madrid: Univiversidad Pontificia de Comillas, 2002.
MCINERNY, Ralph. A First Glance of St. Thomas Aquinas. Notre Dame (Indiana): University of Notre Dame Press, 1990.
_____. Aquinas on Human Action: A Theory of Practice. Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1992.
_____. Ethica Thomistica. Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1982.
MICHEL, Florian. La Pensée Catholique en Amérique du Nord (Réseaux Intellectuels et Échanges Culturels entre l’Europe, le Canada et les Etats-Unis). Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 2010.
MURRAY, John C. We Hold These Truths (1960). Maryland: Sheed & Ward, 2005.
NICGORSKI, Walter. “Leo Strauss”, Modern Age 26 (1982).
NUSSBAUM, Martha. Love’s Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
_____. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
PASSERIN D’ENTREVES, Alessandro. Natural Law, New York, Hutchinson University Library, 1951 (trad. it. La dottrina del diritto naturale, Torino 1954).
PETERSEN, Tony, “Leo Strauss, natural right and history”, en https://goo.gl/5IUOta, 2012.
POOLE, Diego. “Grisez y los primeros principios de la ley natural”, en Persona y Derecho 52, pp. 274-337, en http://dadun.unav.edu/handle/10171/14564.
_____. “Lon Fuller”, en Juristas Universales, vol. IV, Madrid, Marcial Pons,
, pp. 391 y ss.
RHONHEIMER, Martin. Ley natural y razón práctica. Trad. de la versión alemana de 1987. Pamplona, Eunsa, 2000 (también traducido al inglés en New York, Fordham University Press, 2000).
_____. The Perspective of Morality: Philosophical Foundations of Thomistic Virtue Ethics, Washington D.C., Catholic University of America Press, 2011.
ROMMEN, Heinrich A. The Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy (1936 vers. original alemana). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998.
_____. The State in Cahtolic Thought, A Treatise in Political Philosophy. St. Louis (MI): Herder, 1945.
SHAW, Russell, “The making of the moral theologian”, en The Catholic World Report, March 1996, Syracuse, NY.
SIGMUND, Paul St. Thomas Aquinas on Politics and Ethics. New York: Norton & Co Inc, 1988.
_____. “Law and politics”, en Kretzmann , N. y Stump, L., (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 217.
SIMON, Yves. The Tradition of Natural Law: A Philosopher’s Reflections. New York: Fordham University Press, 1999.
STORY, Joseph. “Ley natural”, en Enciclopedia Americana, ed. por Francis Lieber en 1982, en http://www.scholastic.com
VEATCH, Henry. For an Ontology of Morals. Evanston (Illinois): Northwestern University Press, 1971.
_____. Human Rights: Fact or Fancy? Baton Rouge (Louisiana): Louisiana State University Press, 1985.
_____. Rational Man. Indianapolis (Indiana): Liberty Fund Inc., 2003.
_____. Swimming Against the Current in Contemporary Philosophy. Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1990.
VOEGELIN, Eric, “Nature of the law and related legal writings”, en The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, vol. 27, Columbia (MO), University of Missouri Press, 1991.
WOLF, Christopher, “Thomistic Natural Law and the american natural law tradition”, en St. Thomas Aquinas and the Natural Law Tradition, Washington D.C., The Catholic University of America Press, 2004.
WRIGHT, Benjamin. American Interpretations of Natural Law. London: Reedit. Routledge, 2016.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution. Essa licença permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista, desde que sem fins comerciais.
É permitido ainda que outros distribuam, adaptem e criem a partir do seu trabalho, sem fins comerciais, desde que lhe atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online após o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors maintain the copyright and grant the Brazilian Journal of Political Studies the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. This license allows the sharing of the work with authorship recognition and initial publication in this journal, as long as it is not for commercial purposes.
It is also allowed that others distribute, adapt and create from their work, without commercial purposes, as long as they attribute due credit for the original creation.
Authors are allowed to enter into additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with authorship recognition and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online after the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.
